That choice wasn't anything that I thought about when leaving academia for government research. Perhaps because my first government post, with the US Army, actually involved a whole lot of creativity. Probably even more than I got to use during my dissertation work.
I think I must have assumed that all scientific positions involve creativity. That must be why I again failed to contemplate this choice when I left that first position for another spot in government, this time as a contractor. Thus far, this experience has been completely different, and often frustrating. In this position, creativity is not valued. At all. Bottom line. It took me a while to even put my finger on what was wrong, but there you have it. Now I have to fix it.
So, if you are considering a position outside of academia, let this be a lesson. Find out what level of creativity will be expected from you and make sure it’s compatible with your own philosophy of work. (Hint: don't ask the boss, ask your would be colleagues).
Report abuse
I kinda faced the same thing, but in the opposite way. I started working in a lab that valued more creativity than my old job, and I wasn’t quite prepared for it, since I don’t see myself as a very creative person.
Post new comment